Notta and SpeechText.AI are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. SpeechText.AI: AI speech-to-text service that transcribes interviews, meetings and podcasts with speaker ID, domain models and searchable audio. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and SpeechText.AI when transcribing research and journalistic interviews with privacy requirements matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); SpeechText.AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Automatic transcription of uploaded audio and video files
Standout feature
AI summaries
Speaker identification across multi-participant recordings
Team usage
File upload transcription
Support for 30+ languages with regional accents
Integrations
CRM integrations
Domain-optimized models for fields like healthcare, finance and legal
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
Interactive transcript editing and verification tools
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Natural-language search inside audio recordings
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
SpeechText.AI
Choose SpeechText.AI if you need transcribing research and journalistic interviews with privacy requirements — strengths include domain-specific models can improve accuracy on specialized terminology.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
SpeechText.AI
+ Domain-specific models can improve accuracy on specialized terminology
+ EU hosting and GDPR-aligned data residency for privacy-sensitive work
- Works from uploaded recordings rather than joining live meetings
FAQ
Is Notta or SpeechText.AI better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while SpeechText.AI is strong for transcribing research and journalistic interviews with privacy requirements. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and SpeechText.AI compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and SpeechText.AI is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and SpeechText.AI?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.