Notta and Speakr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Configurable AI models compatible with OpenAI, OpenRouter, and local models
Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks
Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection
Standout feature
AI summaries
Optional AI-powered speaker diarization
Team usage
File upload transcription
Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks
Integrations
CRM integrations
Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
System and browser-tab audio capture
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
Speakr
+ Runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control
+ Action-item extraction and per-recording chat go beyond plain transcripts
- Current releases are alpha-stage and may not be production-stable
FAQ
Is Notta or Speakr better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and Speakr compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and Speakr?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.