Notta and Soniox are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Soniox: Multilingual speech AI platform offering real-time and async speech-to-text and translation APIs for meetings and voice apps. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and Soniox when transcribing multilingual meetings and calls in real time matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); Soniox is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Speaker separation for multi-participant conversations
Team usage
File upload transcription
Real-time speech translation across many language pairs
Integrations
CRM integrations
Code-switching support for mid-sentence language changes
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
Web and server SDKs for browser and backend integration
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Enterprise compliance with SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Soniox
Choose Soniox if you need transcribing multilingual meetings and calls in real time — strengths include strong multilingual and translation capabilities for global meetings.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
Soniox
+ Strong multilingual and translation capabilities for global meetings
+ Low-latency real-time streaming suitable for live use
- Delivered as an API rather than a turnkey meeting product
FAQ
Is Notta or Soniox better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while Soniox is strong for transcribing multilingual meetings and calls in real time. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and Soniox compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and Soniox is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and Soniox?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.