Notta and Skribby are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Skribby: Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and Skribby when adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Developer-focused meeting bot API by Skribe VOF that deploys recording and transcription bots to Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet with bring-your-own-key transcription.
Bot authentication for joining restricted meetings
Bring-your-own-key support for 10+ transcription providers (Deepgram, Whisper, AssemblyAI, Soniox, ElevenLabs)
Meeting bots that join and record Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Meeting bots that join and record Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet
Standout feature
AI summaries
Real-time transcription over WebSocket plus asynchronous transcripts
Team usage
File upload transcription
Bring-your-own-key support for 10+ transcription providers (Deepgram, Whisper, AssemblyAI, Soniox, ElevenLabs)
Integrations
CRM integrations
Webhook notifications for transcripts and bot events
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
Speaker identification (diarization) and 30+ language support
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Bot authentication for joining restricted meetings
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Skribby
Choose Skribby if you need adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api — strengths include pay-as-you-go api with no monthly minimums or contracts.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
Skribby
+ Pay-as-you-go API with no monthly minimums or contracts
+ Provider-agnostic transcription via bring-your-own-key across many engines
- Cloud-only managed service with no self-hosting or open-source option
FAQ
Is Notta or Skribby better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while Skribby is strong for adding meeting recording and transcription to a saas product via api. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and Skribby compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and Skribby is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and Skribby?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.