Notta and Scriber GPT are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: High-accuracy transcription with 42+ language translation Scriber GPT: AI audio and video transcription tool for meetings, interviews, and webinars with speaker detection and subtitle export. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and Scriber GPT when transcribing job and research interviews with labeled speakers matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); Scriber GPT is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI transcription for audio and video across many file formats
Standout feature
AI summaries
Speaker diarization with labeled speakers and timestamps
Team usage
File upload transcription
Subtitle export in SRT plus PDF, DOCX, and TXT
Integrations
CRM integrations
Translation of transcripts while preserving speaker labels and timestamps
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
Dedicated interview and webinar transcription workflows
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Support for 90+ languages
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Scriber GPT
Choose Scriber GPT if you need transcribing job and research interviews with labeled speakers — strengths include covers meetings, interviews, and webinars with speaker-labeled output.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
Scriber GPT
+ Covers meetings, interviews, and webinars with speaker-labeled output
+ Multiple export formats including subtitle files
- Free tier provides only a limited number of minutes
FAQ
Is Notta or Scriber GPT better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while Scriber GPT is strong for transcribing job and research interviews with labeled speakers. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and Scriber GPT compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and Scriber GPT is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and Scriber GPT?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.