Notta and Scrib are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Scrib: India-built AI transcription tool for 22 Indian languages plus global languages, with speaker labels, summaries, and meeting-bot capture for Zoom, Meet, and Teams. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and Scrib when transcribing multilingual or hinglish team meetings captured live or via the zoom/meet/teams bot matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
India-built AI transcription tool for 22 Indian languages plus global languages, with speaker labels, summaries, and meeting-bot capture for Zoom, Meet, and Teams.
AI-generated summaries, chapters, key insights, and action items
Automatic speaker recognition with per-speaker labels and timelines
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); Scrib is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Transcription across 22 Indian languages plus 19 global languages, with Hindi-English code-switching support
Standout feature
AI summaries
Multiple capture methods: file upload, live microphone recording, link pasting (YouTube, Loom, Drive, Dropbox), and a meeting bot
Team usage
File upload transcription
Meeting bot that joins Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams to transcribe calls automatically
Integrations
CRM integrations
Automatic speaker recognition with per-speaker labels and timelines
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
AI-generated summaries, chapters, key insights, and action items
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Inline transcript editing with click-to-seek playback
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Scrib
Choose Scrib if you need transcribing multilingual or hinglish team meetings captured live or via the zoom/meet/teams bot — strengths include strong coverage of indian languages and hinglish code-switching that many global tools handle less reliably.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
Scrib
+ Strong coverage of Indian languages and Hinglish code-switching that many global tools handle less reliably
+ Flexible input options, from uploads and live recording to a bot that joins online meetings
- Free tier is limited to a small monthly transcription quota and a daily file cap
FAQ
Is Notta or Scrib better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while Scrib is strong for transcribing multilingual or hinglish team meetings captured live or via the zoom/meet/teams bot. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and Scrib compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and Scrib is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and Scrib?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
Notta vs Scrib: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo