Notta and Rafiki are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Rafiki: AI sales intelligence platform that records, transcribes, and analyzes sales conversations to surface deal and coaching insights. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and Rafiki when automatically capturing notes and action items from sales calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); Rafiki is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Records and transcribes calls across Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, and phone
Standout feature
AI summaries
AI-generated meeting summaries and follow-up email drafts
Team usage
File upload transcription
Call scoring against MEDDIC and BANT frameworks
Integrations
CRM integrations
Deal and pipeline-level conversation analysis
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
CRM integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Zoho, and Pipedrive
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
AI role play for rep training and a natural-language 'Ask Rafiki' query tool
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Rafiki
Choose Rafiki if you need automatically capturing notes and action items from sales calls — strengths include combines note-taking, coaching, and revenue intelligence in one platform.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
Rafiki
+ Combines note-taking, coaching, and revenue intelligence in one platform
- Some advertised capabilities are listed as upcoming rather than fully shipped
FAQ
Is Notta or Rafiki better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while Rafiki is strong for automatically capturing notes and action items from sales calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and Rafiki compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and Rafiki is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and Rafiki?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.