Notta and Proactor AI are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Proactor AI: AI note-taking app that records conversations, transcribes in real time, and turns meetings into structured notes and tasks. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and Proactor AI when capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); Proactor AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI summaries, key insights, and in-conversation suggestions
Team usage
File upload transcription
Automatic action items with assigned owners and due dates
Integrations
CRM integrations
Notes organized by speaker and topic
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
Cross-session context retention
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Export to PDF, Word, Markdown, and TXT
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Proactor AI
Choose Proactor AI if you need capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks — strengths include converts conversations directly into trackable tasks with owners and due dates.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
Proactor AI
+ Converts conversations directly into trackable tasks with owners and due dates
+ Real-time transcription and suggestions during the meeting
- Advanced capabilities are gated behind paid subscription tiers
FAQ
Is Notta or Proactor AI better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while Proactor AI is strong for capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and Proactor AI compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and Proactor AI is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and Proactor AI?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.