Notta and PrismaScribe are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. PrismaScribe: AI transcription tool that converts interviews, meetings, podcasts and lectures into text with multi-speaker labeling and many export formats. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and PrismaScribe when transcribing research and journalistic interviews with multiple speakers matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); PrismaScribe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI transcription of uploaded audio and video files
Standout feature
AI summaries
Speaker identification and labeling for multiple speakers
Team usage
File upload transcription
Transcription and translation across many languages with auto-detection
Integrations
CRM integrations
Support for a wide range of audio and video formats
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
Faster-than-real-time processing speed
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Export to TXT, SRT, VTT, PDF, Word and Markdown
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
PrismaScribe
Choose PrismaScribe if you need transcribing research and journalistic interviews with multiple speakers — strengths include strong multi-speaker and multilingual handling for research-style recordings.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
PrismaScribe
+ Strong multi-speaker and multilingual handling for research-style recordings
+ Many export formats, including subtitle files for video
- Transcribes recorded files rather than offering live in-meeting capture
FAQ
Is Notta or PrismaScribe better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while PrismaScribe is strong for transcribing research and journalistic interviews with multiple speakers. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and PrismaScribe compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and PrismaScribe is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and PrismaScribe?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.