Notta and Pluely are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Pluely: A lightweight open-source desktop AI meeting assistant that captures system audio for live transcription and on-call answers without joining as a visible bot. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and Pluely when getting live transcription and ai assistance during meetings without a visible bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A lightweight open-source desktop AI meeting assistant that captures system audio for live transcription and on-call answers without joining as a visible bot.
Always-on-top overlay app for macOS, Windows, and Linux
Bot-free capture of system audio and microphone for live transcription
Bring-your-own-key support for many LLMs (OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Mistral, Cohere, Ollama, custom)
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); Pluely is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Bot-free capture of system audio and microphone for live transcription
Standout feature
AI summaries
Always-on-top overlay app for macOS, Windows, and Linux
Team usage
File upload transcription
Bring-your-own-key support for many LLMs (OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Mistral, Cohere, Ollama, custom)
Integrations
CRM integrations
Multiple speech-to-text providers (Whisper, Deepgram, ElevenLabs, Groq, Azure, and others)
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
Lightweight (~10MB) and fast to launch
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Open source under GPL with optional local processing via Ollama
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Pluely
Choose Pluely if you need getting live transcription and ai assistance during meetings without a visible bot in the call — strengths include free and open source with fully inspectable code.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
Pluely
+ Free and open source with fully inspectable code
+ Bot-free and can run locally for privacy when paired with local models
- Requires bringing your own API keys, adding setup effort and external usage costs
FAQ
Is Notta or Pluely better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while Pluely is strong for getting live transcription and ai assistance during meetings without a visible bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and Pluely compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and Pluely is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and Pluely?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.