Notta and OpenWhispr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. OpenWhispr: Open-source, privacy-first voice-to-text desktop app for Mac, Windows, and Linux that also transcribes meetings into AI-organized notes. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and OpenWhispr when privately transcribing computer-audio meetings without a bot joining the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); OpenWhispr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Open-source and auditable, with code published on GitHub
Standout feature
AI summaries
Cross-platform desktop app for macOS, Windows, and Linux
Team usage
File upload transcription
Local transcription via bundled Whisper and NVIDIA Parakeet models
Integrations
CRM integrations
Bring-your-own-key cloud model option for flexibility
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
AI Notepad that turns rough meeting notes plus transcript into structured minutes
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Full-text search and AI Chat across captured meetings
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
OpenWhispr
Choose OpenWhispr if you need privately transcribing computer-audio meetings without a bot joining the call — strengths include fully open source, so users can inspect and self-host the code.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
OpenWhispr
+ Fully open source, so users can inspect and self-host the code
+ Local model support enables private, offline transcription
- Primarily a dictation tool, so meeting features are secondary rather than the main focus
FAQ
Is Notta or OpenWhispr better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while OpenWhispr is strong for privately transcribing computer-audio meetings without a bot joining the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and OpenWhispr compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and OpenWhispr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and OpenWhispr?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.