Notta and OpenOats are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. OpenOats: Open-source macOS meeting note-taker that transcribes calls locally and surfaces relevant talking points from your own notes in real time. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and OpenOats when getting live, context-aware prompts from your own notes during sales or customer calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); OpenOats is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Real-time local transcription of both sides of a conversation on Apple Silicon
Standout feature
AI summaries
Live retrieval of relevant talking points from your own notes during meetings
Team usage
File upload transcription
Window hidden from screen sharing by default for privacy on calls
Integrations
CRM integrations
Auto-saved transcripts and session logs to local files
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
Works fully local via Ollama or with cloud models (OpenRouter, Voyage AI)
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
MIT-licensed, self-hostable Swift application
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
OpenOats
Choose OpenOats if you need getting live, context-aware prompts from your own notes during sales or customer calls — strengths include local on-device transcription keeps meeting audio private.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
OpenOats
+ Local on-device transcription keeps meeting audio private
+ Real-time note surfacing acts as a meeting copilot, not just a passive recorder
- Restricted to Apple Silicon Macs on recent macOS versions
FAQ
Is Notta or OpenOats better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while OpenOats is strong for getting live, context-aware prompts from your own notes during sales or customer calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and OpenOats compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and OpenOats is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and OpenOats?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.