Notta and meetXcc are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. meetXcc: Bot-free Chrome extension that joins Google Meet invisibly, transcribes in many languages, and turns conversations into structured notes, mind maps, and action items. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and meetXcc when google meet users who want bot-free capture without an extra participant matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Bot-free Chrome extension that joins Google Meet invisibly, transcribes in many languages, and turns conversations into structured notes, mind maps, and action items.
Action item and highlight extraction with inline note-taking
AI summaries organized by people, topics, and timeline
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); meetXcc is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI summaries organized by people, topics, and timeline
Integrations
CRM integrations
Mind map generation from meeting content
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
Action item and highlight extraction with inline note-taking
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
One-click export, email, and cloud storage sync
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
meetXcc
Choose meetXcc if you need google meet users who want bot-free capture without an extra participant — strengths include invisible, bot-free capture avoids adding a participant to the call.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
meetXcc
+ Invisible, bot-free capture avoids adding a participant to the call
+ Mind map output offers a visual alternative to plain text summaries
- Primarily targets Google Meet rather than Zoom or Teams
FAQ
Is Notta or meetXcc better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while meetXcc is strong for google meet users who want bot-free capture without an extra participant. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and meetXcc compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and meetXcc is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and meetXcc?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.