Notta and joinly are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. joinly: Open-source, self-hostable connector that lets AI agents join Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams calls to transcribe, listen, and act in real time via MCP. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most, and joinly when building custom ai meeting agents that answer questions and run tasks during live calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, self-hostable connector that lets AI agents join Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams calls to transcribe, listen, and act in real time via MCP.
Cross-platform support for Google Meet, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and browser-based calls
Docker-based self-hosting with optional CUDA GPU image
MCP server that exposes meeting tools (join/leave, transcript, chat, audio control, snapshots) to AI agents
Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium); joinly is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
MCP server that exposes meeting tools (join/leave, transcript, chat, audio control, snapshots) to AI agents
Standout feature
AI summaries
Real-time transcription with timestamps and speaker information, subscribable for live updates
Team usage
File upload transcription
Cross-platform support for Google Meet, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and browser-based calls
Integrations
CRM integrations
Modular speech-to-text and text-to-speech backends (Whisper, Deepgram, Kokoro, ElevenLabs)
Languages & capture
58-language transcription
Model-agnostic: works with OpenAI, Anthropic, and local LLMs via Ollama
Best-fit workflow
AI summaries
Docker-based self-hosting with optional CUDA GPU image
Best for
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
joinly
Choose joinly if you need building custom ai meeting agents that answer questions and run tasks during live calls — strengths include fully open source (mit) and self-hostable for complete data control.
Pros & cons
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
joinly
+ Fully open source (MIT) and self-hostable for complete data control
+ Agents can actively participate by voice and chat, not just passively transcribe
- Developer-oriented framework that requires setup and engineering effort rather than a ready-made app
FAQ
Is Notta or joinly better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription, while joinly is strong for building custom ai meeting agents that answer questions and run tasks during live calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notta and joinly compare on price?
Notta is from $8.17/mo and joinly is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notta and joinly?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.