Notigo and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Notigo: Real-time AI meeting assistant that generates live summaries, structured notes, and action items as conversations unfold. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Notigo when capturing structured notes during business and team meetings matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Real-time AI meeting assistant that generates live summaries, structured notes, and action items as conversations unfold.
Automatic extraction of key points, decisions, and action itemsExport of notes to common document formats (PDF, Word, TXT)Multilingual transcription and translation support
Notigo is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Real-time meeting summaries generated during the conversation
Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio
Standout feature
Automatic extraction of key points, decisions, and action items
Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings
Team usage
Multilingual transcription and translation support
Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace
Integrations
Real-time collaborative note editing for multiple participants
Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects
Languages & capture
Export of notes to common document formats (PDF, Word, TXT)
Automatic meeting detection on Mac
Best-fit workflow
Profession-specific solution pages for business, education, consultants, and legal
60+ language support with automatic detection
Best for
Notigo
Choose Notigo if you need capturing structured notes during business and team meetings — strengths include produces structured notes live instead of only a post-meeting transcript.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Pros & cons
Notigo
+ Produces structured notes live instead of only a post-meeting transcript
+ Collaborative editing lets teammates refine notes together in real time
- Real-time summarization quality depends on audio clarity and meeting conditions
Tana
+ Captures meetings without adding a bot to the call
+ Meeting notes flow into a connected, structured knowledge base
- Requires the Tana desktop app and adopting its outliner workflow
FAQ
Is Notigo or Tana better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Notigo is strong for capturing structured notes during business and team meetings, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Notigo and Tana compare on price?
Notigo is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Notigo and Tana?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.