NoteWave and Scribbl are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. NoteWave: An indie AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings across Zoom, Teams, Google Meet, in-person, and uploaded audio. Scribbl: Chrome extension that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings without sending a bot into the call. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist NoteWave when capturing notes and action items from remote calls across zoom, teams, and google meet matters most, and Scribbl when taking bot-free notes during google meet calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
NoteWave is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Scribbl is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Records and transcribes meetings from Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, browser, and mobile
Chrome extension that records and transcribes meetings
Standout feature
Uploads and transcribes existing audio files (MP3, WAV, M4A)
Bot-free capture directly through the browser
Team usage
Speaker identification and AI-generated summaries
AI summaries with key points and action items
Integrations
Automatic topic tagging and action-item detection
Searchable combination of video, transcript, and notes
Languages & capture
Assistant for querying past meetings in natural language
Support for many transcription languages
Best-fit workflow
Multilingual transcription support
Chrome extension that records and transcribes meetings
Best for
NoteWave
Choose NoteWave if you need capturing notes and action items from remote calls across zoom, teams, and google meet — strengths include captures both online and in-person meetings plus uploaded audio in one tool.
Scribbl
Choose Scribbl if you need taking bot-free notes during google meet calls — strengths include captures meetings without adding a visible bot participant.
Pros & cons
NoteWave
+ Captures both online and in-person meetings plus uploaded audio in one tool
+ Not tied to a single conferencing platform
- Early-stage indie product from a small startup, so it is less battle-tested than established incumbents
Scribbl
+ Captures meetings without adding a visible bot participant
+ Lightweight setup as a browser extension
- Primary support centered on Google Meet, with other platforms still expanding
FAQ
Is NoteWave or Scribbl better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. NoteWave is strong for capturing notes and action items from remote calls across zoom, teams, and google meet, while Scribbl is strong for taking bot-free notes during google meet calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do NoteWave and Scribbl compare on price?
NoteWave is a free tier with paid upgrades and Scribbl is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both NoteWave and Scribbl?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.