NoteGPT and Notta are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. NoteGPT: AI note-taker that records, transcribes and summarizes meetings, lectures, podcasts and videos into organized notes. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist NoteGPT when summarizing uploaded zoom, meet or teams meeting recordings matters most, and Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI note-taker that records, transcribes and summarizes meetings, lectures, podcasts and videos into organized notes.
AI chat to ask questions about a transcript and extract detailsRecords, transcribes and summarizes meetings, lectures and podcastsSpeaker separation and labeling in transcripts
NoteGPT is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Records, transcribes and summarizes meetings, lectures and podcasts
58-language transcription
Standout feature
Works with Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams recordings
AI summaries
Team usage
Speaker separation and labeling in transcripts
File upload transcription
Integrations
Support for long recordings, large files and batch uploads
CRM integrations
Languages & capture
AI chat to ask questions about a transcript and extract details
58-language transcription
Best-fit workflow
Translation across many languages for shared notes
AI summaries
Best for
NoteGPT
Choose NoteGPT if you need summarizing uploaded zoom, meet or teams meeting recordings — strengths include free meeting note-taker option with no sign-up required for basic use.
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Pros & cons
NoteGPT
+ Free meeting note-taker option with no sign-up required for basic use
+ Handles long meetings and bulk file processing
- Documentation indicates limited live, in-meeting transcription versus upload-based processing
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
FAQ
Is NoteGPT or Notta better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. NoteGPT is strong for summarizing uploaded zoom, meet or teams meeting recordings, while Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do NoteGPT and Notta compare on price?
NoteGPT is a free tier with paid upgrades and Notta is from $8.17/mo. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both NoteGPT and Notta?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.