Note67 and Zocks are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. Zocks: Privacy-first AI assistant for financial advisors that automates client meeting notes, follow-ups, forms, and CRM updates. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and Zocks when documenting client review and discovery meetings for compliance and records matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Zocks is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI note-taking with speaker attribution for client meetings
Standout feature
AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama
Live meeting analysis during calls
Team usage
Captures both microphone and system audio
Automatic form filling for intake, fact-finder, and account-opening documents
Integrations
Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants
CRM auto-sync with Wealthbox, Redtail, Salesforce, HubSpot, and eMoney
Languages & capture
Native desktop app for macOS and Windows
AI-drafted follow-up and client response emails
Best-fit workflow
Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device
Pre-meeting preparation with agendas and client profiles
Best for
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
Zocks
Choose Zocks if you need documenting client review and discovery meetings for compliance and records — strengths include purpose-built for financial advisors rather than a generic notetaker.
Pros & cons
Note67
+ Local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine
+ Suited to confidentiality and compliance-sensitive use cases
- Local AI models depend on the user's own hardware for performance
Zocks
+ Purpose-built for financial advisors rather than a generic notetaker
+ Privacy-oriented design that does not retain meeting audio or video
- Focused on financial services, so less suited to other professions
FAQ
Is Note67 or Zocks better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while Zocks is strong for documenting client review and discovery meetings for compliance and records. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Note67 and Zocks compare on price?
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and Zocks is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Note67 and Zocks?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.