Note67 and WAVV are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. WAVV: CRM-embedded multi-line dialer with call recording and live listen-in coaching, focused on real estate and insurance sales. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and WAVV when real estate and insurance agents prospecting at high call volume matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); WAVV is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Multi-line dialer that connects reps to live answers
Standout feature
AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama
CRM-embedded operation (HighLevel and other CRMs)
Team usage
Captures both microphone and system audio
Call recording for training and quality assurance
Integrations
Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants
Live call monitoring and supervisor listen-in coaching
Languages & capture
Native desktop app for macOS and Windows
Voicemail drop for pre-recorded messages
Best-fit workflow
Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device
Local-presence dialing
Best for
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
WAVV
Choose WAVV if you need real estate and insurance agents prospecting at high call volume — strengths include embeds directly into crms so reps work without switching tools.
Pros & cons
Note67
+ Local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine
+ Suited to confidentiality and compliance-sensitive use cases
- Local AI models depend on the user's own hardware for performance
WAVV
+ Embeds directly into CRMs so reps work without switching tools
- Strongly oriented toward real estate and insurance use cases
FAQ
Is Note67 or WAVV better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while WAVV is strong for real estate and insurance agents prospecting at high call volume. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Note67 and WAVV compare on price?
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and WAVV is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Note67 and WAVV?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.