Note67 and Vexa are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. Vexa: API-first, open-source meeting transcription platform that deploys bots to capture real-time, speaker-labeled transcripts for developers. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and Vexa when building custom meeting-intelligence features into a product matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Vexa is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
API-first design with REST and WebSocket interfaces
Standout feature
AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama
Real-time, speaker-diarized transcription with low latency
Team usage
Captures both microphone and system audio
Deployable bots that join meetings via URL to capture audio
Integrations
Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants
Open-source (Apache 2.0) with self-hosted or managed cloud options
Languages & capture
Native desktop app for macOS and Windows
Data storage with query and export capabilities
Best-fit workflow
Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device
Supports Google Meet and Microsoft Teams (Zoom planned)
Best for
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
Vexa
Choose Vexa if you need building custom meeting-intelligence features into a product — strengths include programmable infrastructure for embedding meeting transcription into products.
Pros & cons
Note67
+ Local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine
+ Suited to confidentiality and compliance-sensitive use cases
- Local AI models depend on the user's own hardware for performance
Vexa
+ Programmable infrastructure for embedding meeting transcription into products
+ Open-source and self-hostable for control over data and deployment
- Developer-oriented rather than a ready-to-use end-user notetaking app
FAQ
Is Note67 or Vexa better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while Vexa is strong for building custom meeting-intelligence features into a product. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Note67 and Vexa compare on price?
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and Vexa is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Note67 and Vexa?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.