Note67 and Typist are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. Typist: AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and Typist when transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Audio and video to text transcription across many file formats
Standout feature
AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama
Export to SRT subtitles, WebVTT captions, DOCX, PDF, and TXT
Team usage
Captures both microphone and system audio
Multiple transcription models trading off speed and accuracy
Integrations
Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants
Speaker identification on the highest-accuracy tier
Languages & capture
Native desktop app for macOS and Windows
Word-level and segment-level timestamps for clean subtitle timing
Best-fit workflow
Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device
Support for a wide range of languages and accents
Best for
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
Typist
Choose Typist if you need transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls — strengths include clean subtitle exports (srt and webvtt) that import into video editors.
Pros & cons
Note67
+ Local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine
+ Suited to confidentiality and compliance-sensitive use cases
- Local AI models depend on the user's own hardware for performance
Typist
+ Clean subtitle exports (SRT and WebVTT) that import into video editors
+ Choice of models lets users prioritize speed or accuracy per job
- Speaker identification is limited to the top tier
FAQ
Is Note67 or Typist better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while Typist is strong for transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Note67 and Typist compare on price?
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Note67 and Typist?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.