Note67 and Trellus are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. Trellus: Real-time AI sales coaching and parallel dialer delivered as a lightweight Chrome extension that layers onto existing sales tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and Trellus when coaching reps in real time during outbound calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Trellus is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Real-time, in-call AI coaching and adaptive guidance
Standout feature
AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama
Parallel dialer with multiple simultaneous lines
Team usage
Captures both microphone and system audio
Automated voicemail drops and number-health monitoring
Integrations
Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants
AI voice agents for practice roleplay and inbound qualification
Languages & capture
Native desktop app for macOS and Windows
Call analytics and performance scoring
Best-fit workflow
Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device
Chrome extension that layers onto Salesloft, Outreach, and HubSpot
Best for
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
Trellus
Choose Trellus if you need coaching reps in real time during outbound calls — strengths include adds live coaching and dialing without replacing existing tools.
Pros & cons
Note67
+ Local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine
+ Suited to confidentiality and compliance-sensitive use cases
- Local AI models depend on the user's own hardware for performance
Trellus
+ Adds live coaching and dialing without replacing existing tools
+ Lightweight browser-extension deployment
- Focused on outbound calling rather than full meeting capture
FAQ
Is Note67 or Trellus better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while Trellus is strong for coaching reps in real time during outbound calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Note67 and Trellus compare on price?
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and Trellus is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Note67 and Trellus?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.