Note67 and timeOS are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. timeOS: AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and timeOS when automated post-meeting workflows matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models.
AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Note67 | timeOS |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Local on-device transcription using Whisper | Automatic capture and transcription |
| Standout feature | AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama | AI summaries and action items |
| Team usage | Captures both microphone and system audio | Sync notes to docs and task tools |
| Integrations | Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants | Multi-language support |
| Languages & capture | Native desktop app for macOS and Windows | Shareable recaps |
| Best-fit workflow | Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device | Automatic capture and transcription |
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
timeOS
Choose timeOS if you need automated post-meeting workflows — strengths include automates post-meeting follow-up across tools.
Note67
timeOS
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while timeOS is strong for automated post-meeting workflows. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.