Note67 and Terret are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. Terret: AI revenue intelligence platform (formerly BoostUp) with native conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls to drive forecasting and coaching. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and Terret when analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models.
AI revenue intelligence platform (formerly BoostUp) with native conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls to drive forecasting and coaching.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Terret is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Note67 | Terret |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Local on-device transcription using Whisper | Conversation intelligence that records and analyzes sales calls at scale |
| Standout feature | AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama | Native integration of call insights with AI forecasting and deal scoring |
| Team usage | Captures both microphone and system audio | Automatic CRM field population and follow-up action generation |
| Integrations | Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants | AI-generated sales playbooks based on top-performer behavior |
| Languages & capture | Native desktop app for macOS and Windows | Real-time pre-call briefs delivered via Slack |
| Best-fit workflow | Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device | Deal-risk detection, product-gap analysis, and expansion-signal surfacing |
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
Terret
Choose Terret if you need analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring — strengths include conversation intelligence is tightly coupled to forecasting and pipeline analytics.
Note67
Terret
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while Terret is strong for analyzing recorded sales calls to inform forecasting and deal-health scoring. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and Terret is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.