Note67 and TeamRetro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. TeamRetro: Purpose-built online tool for running agile retrospectives, team health checks, and planning poker with AI-assisted idea grouping and summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and TeamRetro when running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Guided retrospective workflow with anonymous input, grouping, and dot voting
Standout feature
AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama
AI-assisted automatic grouping of similar ideas into themes
Team usage
Captures both microphone and system audio
AI-generated retrospective summaries (when enabled by the organization)
Integrations
Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants
Recurring team health checks with trend and sentiment tracking over time
Languages & capture
Native desktop app for macOS and Windows
Large library of retrospective templates and icebreaker activities
Best-fit workflow
Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device
Action-item tracking carried across sessions
Best for
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
TeamRetro
Choose TeamRetro if you need running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams — strengths include purpose-built for retrospectives rather than a repurposed generic whiteboard.
Pros & cons
Note67
+ Local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine
+ Suited to confidentiality and compliance-sensitive use cases
- Local AI models depend on the user's own hardware for performance
TeamRetro
+ Purpose-built for retrospectives rather than a repurposed generic whiteboard
+ AI grouping and summaries reduce facilitation overhead during retros
- Focused on agile retrospectives and team health, so it is narrower than a general meeting assistant
FAQ
Is Note67 or TeamRetro better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while TeamRetro is strong for running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Note67 and TeamRetro compare on price?
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Note67 and TeamRetro?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.