Note67 and Substrata are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. Substrata: AI sales intelligence platform that analyzes the social and emotional signals behind conversations to help dealmakers read buyer intent. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and Substrata when reading buyer intent and sentiment during negotiations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Substrata is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
SoundWave real-time analysis of tone, pace, pauses, and interruptions
Standout feature
AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama
Behavioral analysis of buyer attitudes, intent, and power dynamics
Team usage
Captures both microphone and system audio
Email signal analysis for sentiment and engagement
Integrations
Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants
Deal momentum tracking across conversations
Languages & capture
Native desktop app for macOS and Windows
Coaching insights focused on social and emotional cues
Best-fit workflow
Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device
SoundWave real-time analysis of tone, pace, pauses, and interruptions
Best for
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
Substrata
Choose Substrata if you need reading buyer intent and sentiment during negotiations — strengths include analyzes social and emotional subtext beyond plain transcription.
Pros & cons
Note67
+ Local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine
+ Suited to confidentiality and compliance-sensitive use cases
- Local AI models depend on the user's own hardware for performance
Substrata
+ Analyzes social and emotional subtext beyond plain transcription
+ Real-time read on buyer dynamics during calls
- Behavioral-signal approach differs from familiar transcript-based tools
FAQ
Is Note67 or Substrata better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while Substrata is strong for reading buyer intent and sentiment during negotiations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Note67 and Substrata compare on price?
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and Substrata is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Note67 and Substrata?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.