Note67 and Stenomatic are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. Stenomatic: AI live translation and captioning platform that delivers real-time interpretation and translated captions for conferences, meetings, and webinars. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and Stenomatic when adding live translated captions to an international conference or summit matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models.
AI live translation and captioning platform that delivers real-time interpretation and translated captions for conferences, meetings, and webinars.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Stenomatic is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Note67 | Stenomatic |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Local on-device transcription using Whisper | Real-time voice-to-voice interpretation for live events |
| Standout feature | AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama | Translated live captions and on-screen transcription |
| Team usage | Captures both microphone and system audio | Support for a very large set of languages and multi-directional conversations |
| Integrations | Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants | No-download attendee access via a branded web link |
| Languages & capture | Native desktop app for macOS and Windows | Custom terminology input for specialized vocabulary |
| Best-fit workflow | Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device | API, embeddable widget, and InEvent integration |
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
Stenomatic
Choose Stenomatic if you need adding live translated captions to an international conference or summit — strengths include attendees need no app install, just a web link.
Note67
Stenomatic
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while Stenomatic is strong for adding live translated captions to an international conference or summit. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and Stenomatic is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.