Note67 and SRTGen are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. SRTGen: AI subtitle and SRT generator that also transcribes meetings, interviews, and podcasts with multi-format caption export. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and SRTGen when generating srt and vtt subtitles for podcasts and video content matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); SRTGen is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI subtitle generation with automatic speaker separation
Standout feature
AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama
Transcription for corporate meetings, conferences, interviews, and research
Team usage
Captures both microphone and system audio
Export to SRT, VTT, ASS, TXT, DOCX, PDF, and JSON
Integrations
Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants
Translation across a large set of languages and locales
Languages & capture
Native desktop app for macOS and Windows
Timeline-based subtitle editor with animation and burn-in options
Best-fit workflow
Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device
Real-time multi-user collaborative editing
Best for
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
SRTGen
Choose SRTGen if you need generating srt and vtt subtitles for podcasts and video content — strengths include strong caption-file output options for video editing workflows.
Pros & cons
Note67
+ Local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine
+ Suited to confidentiality and compliance-sensitive use cases
- Local AI models depend on the user's own hardware for performance
SRTGen
+ Strong caption-file output options for video editing workflows
+ Covers meetings and interviews in addition to social video subtitles
- Primarily oriented toward subtitle files rather than live meeting note-taking
FAQ
Is Note67 or SRTGen better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while SRTGen is strong for generating srt and vtt subtitles for podcasts and video content. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Note67 and SRTGen compare on price?
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and SRTGen is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Note67 and SRTGen?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.