Note67 and Spiky.ai are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. Spiky.ai: Conversation intelligence and real-time AI coaching platform that records, analyzes, and guides sales meetings for revenue teams. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and Spiky.ai when sdr and ae managers coaching reps on objection handling and talk tracks matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Spiky.ai is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Records and transcribes calls and video meetings from Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet
Standout feature
AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama
Real-time in-call prompts, playbooks, and battlecards for objection handling
Team usage
Captures both microphone and system audio
AI-generated meeting summaries, action items, and follow-up drafts
Integrations
Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants
Conversation analytics: talk ratio, speaking patterns, sentiment, and buyer intent
Languages & capture
Native desktop app for macOS and Windows
Custom keyword trackers and behavior analytics for coaching
Best-fit workflow
Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device
CRM and collaboration integrations (Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, Google Docs)
Best for
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
Spiky.ai
Choose Spiky.ai if you need sdr and ae managers coaching reps on objection handling and talk tracks — strengths include combines real-time coaching with post-call analysis in one platform.
Pros & cons
Note67
+ Local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine
+ Suited to confidentiality and compliance-sensitive use cases
- Local AI models depend on the user's own hardware for performance
Spiky.ai
+ Combines real-time coaching with post-call analysis in one platform
+ Detailed per-rep behavior analytics support scalable, repeatable coaching
- Real-time coaching and analytics depth may be more than very small teams need
FAQ
Is Note67 or Spiky.ai better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while Spiky.ai is strong for sdr and ae managers coaching reps on objection handling and talk tracks. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Note67 and Spiky.ai compare on price?
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and Spiky.ai is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Note67 and Spiky.ai?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.