Note67 and Speakr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Note67 | Speakr |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Local on-device transcription using Whisper | Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection |
| Standout feature | AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama | Optional AI-powered speaker diarization |
| Team usage | Captures both microphone and system audio | Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks |
| Integrations | Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants | Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library |
| Languages & capture | Native desktop app for macOS and Windows | System and browser-tab audio capture |
| Best-fit workflow | Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device | Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard |
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Note67
Speakr
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.