Note67 and SmartDepo are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. SmartDepo: AI deposition summary platform for litigators that produces cited summaries with page-line citations. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and SmartDepo when generating cited page-line summaries of deposition transcripts matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); SmartDepo is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama
Multiple summary formats: page/line summaries, key admissions, abstracts, and memos
Team usage
Captures both microphone and system audio
Topic detection that organizes content like attorney case materials
Integrations
Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants
Full-transcript analysis without omissions
Languages & capture
Native desktop app for macOS and Windows
Human review of AI-generated summaries by legal professionals
Best-fit workflow
Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device
Fast turnaround, with summaries produced in minutes
Best for
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
SmartDepo
Choose SmartDepo if you need generating cited page-line summaries of deposition transcripts — strengths include citation-focused output suitable for court filings.
Pros & cons
Note67
+ Local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine
+ Suited to confidentiality and compliance-sensitive use cases
- Local AI models depend on the user's own hardware for performance
SmartDepo
+ Citation-focused output suitable for court filings
+ Multiple summary formats tailored to different litigation tasks
- Narrowly focused on deposition summaries rather than live transcription or general meetings
FAQ
Is Note67 or SmartDepo better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while SmartDepo is strong for generating cited page-line summaries of deposition transcripts. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Note67 and SmartDepo compare on price?
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and SmartDepo is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Note67 and SmartDepo?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.