Note67 and Scribbl are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. Scribbl: Chrome extension that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings without sending a bot into the call. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and Scribbl when taking bot-free notes during google meet calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Scribbl is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Chrome extension that records and transcribes meetings
Standout feature
AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama
Bot-free capture directly through the browser
Team usage
Captures both microphone and system audio
AI summaries with key points and action items
Integrations
Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants
Searchable combination of video, transcript, and notes
Languages & capture
Native desktop app for macOS and Windows
Support for many transcription languages
Best-fit workflow
Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device
Chrome extension that records and transcribes meetings
Best for
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
Scribbl
Choose Scribbl if you need taking bot-free notes during google meet calls — strengths include captures meetings without adding a visible bot participant.
Pros & cons
Note67
+ Local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine
+ Suited to confidentiality and compliance-sensitive use cases
- Local AI models depend on the user's own hardware for performance
Scribbl
+ Captures meetings without adding a visible bot participant
+ Lightweight setup as a browser extension
- Primary support centered on Google Meet, with other platforms still expanding
FAQ
Is Note67 or Scribbl better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while Scribbl is strong for taking bot-free notes during google meet calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Note67 and Scribbl compare on price?
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and Scribbl is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Note67 and Scribbl?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.