Note67 and Rilla are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. Rilla: Speech analytics and AI coaching platform for in-person field sales that replaces traditional ridealongs with recorded, analyzed conversations. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and Rilla when replacing in-person ridealongs with recorded, analyzed conversations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Rilla is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama
Automatic transcription and AI conversation analysis
Team usage
Captures both microphone and system audio
Asynchronous coaching with comments and highlights
Integrations
Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants
Behavior tracking against top-performer patterns
Languages & capture
Native desktop app for macOS and Windows
Adapts analysis to a team's specific sales process
Best-fit workflow
Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device
Performance visibility across all reps and appointments
Best for
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
Rilla
Choose Rilla if you need replacing in-person ridealongs with recorded, analyzed conversations — strengths include purpose-built for in-person field sales coaching at scale.
Pros & cons
Note67
+ Local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine
+ Suited to confidentiality and compliance-sensitive use cases
- Local AI models depend on the user's own hardware for performance
Rilla
+ Purpose-built for in-person field sales coaching at scale
+ Lets managers coach far more appointments than physical ridealongs
- Focused on in-person selling rather than virtual meetings
FAQ
Is Note67 or Rilla better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while Rilla is strong for replacing in-person ridealongs with recorded, analyzed conversations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Note67 and Rilla compare on price?
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and Rilla is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Note67 and Rilla?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.