Note67 and Rafiki are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. Rafiki: AI sales intelligence platform that records, transcribes, and analyzes sales conversations to surface deal and coaching insights. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and Rafiki when automatically capturing notes and action items from sales calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Rafiki is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Records and transcribes calls across Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, and phone
Standout feature
AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama
AI-generated meeting summaries and follow-up email drafts
Team usage
Captures both microphone and system audio
Call scoring against MEDDIC and BANT frameworks
Integrations
Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants
Deal and pipeline-level conversation analysis
Languages & capture
Native desktop app for macOS and Windows
CRM integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Zoho, and Pipedrive
Best-fit workflow
Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device
AI role play for rep training and a natural-language 'Ask Rafiki' query tool
Best for
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
Rafiki
Choose Rafiki if you need automatically capturing notes and action items from sales calls — strengths include combines note-taking, coaching, and revenue intelligence in one platform.
Pros & cons
Note67
+ Local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine
+ Suited to confidentiality and compliance-sensitive use cases
- Local AI models depend on the user's own hardware for performance
Rafiki
+ Combines note-taking, coaching, and revenue intelligence in one platform
- Some advertised capabilities are listed as upcoming rather than fully shipped
FAQ
Is Note67 or Rafiki better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while Rafiki is strong for automatically capturing notes and action items from sales calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Note67 and Rafiki compare on price?
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and Rafiki is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Note67 and Rafiki?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
Note67 vs Rafiki: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo