Note67 and Proactor AI are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. Proactor AI: AI note-taking app that records conversations, transcribes in real time, and turns meetings into structured notes and tasks. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and Proactor AI when capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Proactor AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama
AI summaries, key insights, and in-conversation suggestions
Team usage
Captures both microphone and system audio
Automatic action items with assigned owners and due dates
Integrations
Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants
Notes organized by speaker and topic
Languages & capture
Native desktop app for macOS and Windows
Cross-session context retention
Best-fit workflow
Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device
Export to PDF, Word, Markdown, and TXT
Best for
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
Proactor AI
Choose Proactor AI if you need capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks — strengths include converts conversations directly into trackable tasks with owners and due dates.
Pros & cons
Note67
+ Local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine
+ Suited to confidentiality and compliance-sensitive use cases
- Local AI models depend on the user's own hardware for performance
Proactor AI
+ Converts conversations directly into trackable tasks with owners and due dates
+ Real-time transcription and suggestions during the meeting
- Advanced capabilities are gated behind paid subscription tiers
FAQ
Is Note67 or Proactor AI better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while Proactor AI is strong for capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Note67 and Proactor AI compare on price?
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and Proactor AI is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Note67 and Proactor AI?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.