Note67 and OpenTranscribe are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. OpenTranscribe: Self-hosted, containerized web app for transcribing and analyzing audio/video with WhisperX, speaker diarization, search, and collaboration. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and OpenTranscribe when teams self-hosting a searchable archive of transcribed meeting and media recordings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models.
Self-hosted, containerized web app for transcribing and analyzing audio/video with WhisperX, speaker diarization, search, and collaboration.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); OpenTranscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Note67 | OpenTranscribe |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Local on-device transcription using Whisper | WhisperX transcription with large-v3-turbo and 100+ language support |
| Standout feature | AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama | Automatic speaker diarization via PyAnnote v4 with overlap detection |
| Team usage | Captures both microphone and system audio | Full-text search and filtering powered by OpenSearch |
| Integrations | Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants | AI summarization, topic extraction, and content analysis via multiple LLM providers |
| Languages & capture | Native desktop app for macOS and Windows | Time-stamped comments for collaboration and annotation |
| Best-fit workflow | Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device | Auto-import from local folders, S3, and SMB shares |
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
OpenTranscribe
Choose OpenTranscribe if you need teams self-hosting a searchable archive of transcribed meeting and media recordings — strengths include fully self-hosted web app with a complete transcription-and-analysis stack.
Note67
OpenTranscribe
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while OpenTranscribe is strong for teams self-hosting a searchable archive of transcribed meeting and media recordings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and OpenTranscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.