Note67 and OpenOats are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. OpenOats: Open-source macOS meeting note-taker that transcribes calls locally and surfaces relevant talking points from your own notes in real time. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and OpenOats when getting live, context-aware prompts from your own notes during sales or customer calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models.
Open-source macOS meeting note-taker that transcribes calls locally and surfaces relevant talking points from your own notes in real time.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); OpenOats is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Note67 | OpenOats |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Local on-device transcription using Whisper | Real-time local transcription of both sides of a conversation on Apple Silicon |
| Standout feature | AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama | Live retrieval of relevant talking points from your own notes during meetings |
| Team usage | Captures both microphone and system audio | Window hidden from screen sharing by default for privacy on calls |
| Integrations | Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants | Auto-saved transcripts and session logs to local files |
| Languages & capture | Native desktop app for macOS and Windows | Works fully local via Ollama or with cloud models (OpenRouter, Voyage AI) |
| Best-fit workflow | Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device | MIT-licensed, self-hostable Swift application |
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
OpenOats
Choose OpenOats if you need getting live, context-aware prompts from your own notes during sales or customer calls — strengths include local on-device transcription keeps meeting audio private.
Note67
OpenOats
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while OpenOats is strong for getting live, context-aware prompts from your own notes during sales or customer calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and OpenOats is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.