Note67 and NoteWave are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. NoteWave: An indie AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings across Zoom, Teams, Google Meet, in-person, and uploaded audio. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and NoteWave when capturing notes and action items from remote calls across zoom, teams, and google meet matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); NoteWave is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Records and transcribes meetings from Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, browser, and mobile
Standout feature
AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama
Uploads and transcribes existing audio files (MP3, WAV, M4A)
Team usage
Captures both microphone and system audio
Speaker identification and AI-generated summaries
Integrations
Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants
Automatic topic tagging and action-item detection
Languages & capture
Native desktop app for macOS and Windows
Assistant for querying past meetings in natural language
Best-fit workflow
Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device
Multilingual transcription support
Best for
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
NoteWave
Choose NoteWave if you need capturing notes and action items from remote calls across zoom, teams, and google meet — strengths include captures both online and in-person meetings plus uploaded audio in one tool.
Pros & cons
Note67
+ Local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine
+ Suited to confidentiality and compliance-sensitive use cases
- Local AI models depend on the user's own hardware for performance
NoteWave
+ Captures both online and in-person meetings plus uploaded audio in one tool
+ Not tied to a single conferencing platform
- Early-stage indie product from a small startup, so it is less battle-tested than established incumbents
FAQ
Is Note67 or NoteWave better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while NoteWave is strong for capturing notes and action items from remote calls across zoom, teams, and google meet. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Note67 and NoteWave compare on price?
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and NoteWave is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Note67 and NoteWave?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.