Note67 and ibisScribe are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. ibisScribe: Japanese browser-based AI meeting minutes tool from Ibis Inc. that transcribes, identifies speakers, and auto-generates summaries without installing an app or adding a bot. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and ibisScribe when japanese businesses needing compliant, browser-only meeting minutes matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models.
Japanese browser-based AI meeting minutes tool from Ibis Inc. that transcribes, identifies speakers, and auto-generates summaries without installing an app or adding a bot.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); ibisScribe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Note67 | ibisScribe |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Local on-device transcription using Whisper | Browser-based transcription with no app install and no meeting bot required |
| Standout feature | AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama | Real-time AI speech recognition for in-person and web meetings |
| Team usage | Captures both microphone and system audio | Automatic speaker identification linking statements to speakers |
| Integrations | Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants | AI-generated summaries with adjustable summarization prompts |
| Languages & capture | Native desktop app for macOS and Windows | Word-format export of completed minutes |
| Best-fit workflow | Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device | Customizable terminology dictionary and multi-language translation |
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
ibisScribe
Choose ibisScribe if you need japanese businesses needing compliant, browser-only meeting minutes — strengths include no bot or installation needed, which simplifies setup and privacy review.
Note67
ibisScribe
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while ibisScribe is strong for japanese businesses needing compliant, browser-only meeting minutes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and ibisScribe is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.