Natively and Zeplyn are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Natively: A free, open-source desktop AI meeting assistant offering real-time transcription, structured notes, and on-call answers with local processing and bring-your-own-key support. Zeplyn: AI meeting assistant for wealth managers that captures structured notes without recording and syncs them to advisor CRMs. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Natively when capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot matters most, and Zeplyn when capturing structured notes from client review and prospect meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A free, open-source desktop AI meeting assistant offering real-time transcription, structured notes, and on-call answers with local processing and bring-your-own-key support.
Bring-your-own-key support for Gemini, OpenAI, Claude, and GroqFully local/offline option through Ollama with local data storage by defaultOn-demand AI assist via keyboard shortcut during calls
AI meeting assistant for wealth managers that captures structured notes without recording and syncs them to advisor CRMs.
Automatic generation of tasks, updates, and follow-up emailsIntegrations with Gmail, Outlook, Zoom, Teams, and Google CalendarOne-click CRM sync with Salesforce, Redtail, HubSpot, and Wealthbox
Natively is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Zeplyn is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Real-time transcription with a low-latency Rust-based audio pipeline
Recording-free structured note capture from client meetings
Standout feature
Structured, searchable meeting notes with action items and decisions
Support for virtual meetings, in-person meetings, and dictations
Team usage
On-demand AI assist via keyboard shortcut during calls
Automatic generation of tasks, updates, and follow-up emails
Integrations
Bring-your-own-key support for Gemini, OpenAI, Claude, and Groq
One-click CRM sync with Salesforce, Redtail, HubSpot, and Wealthbox
Languages & capture
Fully local/offline option through Ollama with local data storage by default
Pre-meeting smart client summaries and discussion agendas
Best-fit workflow
Works alongside Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams without a visible bot
Integrations with Gmail, Outlook, Zoom, Teams, and Google Calendar
Best for
Natively
Choose Natively if you need capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot — strengths include free and open source with active development.
Zeplyn
Choose Zeplyn if you need capturing structured notes from client review and prospect meetings — strengths include built specifically for wealth management workflows.
Pros & cons
Natively
+ Free and open source with active development
+ Can run entirely offline and store data locally for privacy
- Cloud models require user-supplied API keys and incur external usage costs
Zeplyn
+ Built specifically for wealth management workflows
+ Captures structured financial details and action items, not just raw transcript
- Specialized for financial advisors, limiting fit for other industries
FAQ
Is Natively or Zeplyn better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Natively is strong for capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot, while Zeplyn is strong for capturing structured notes from client review and prospect meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Natively and Zeplyn compare on price?
Natively is a free tier with paid upgrades and Zeplyn is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Natively and Zeplyn?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.