Natively and timeOS are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Natively: A free, open-source desktop AI meeting assistant offering real-time transcription, structured notes, and on-call answers with local processing and bring-your-own-key support. timeOS: AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Natively when capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot matters most, and timeOS when automated post-meeting workflows matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A free, open-source desktop AI meeting assistant offering real-time transcription, structured notes, and on-call answers with local processing and bring-your-own-key support.
Bring-your-own-key support for Gemini, OpenAI, Claude, and GroqFully local/offline option through Ollama with local data storage by defaultOn-demand AI assist via keyboard shortcut during calls
Natively is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Real-time transcription with a low-latency Rust-based audio pipeline
Automatic capture and transcription
Standout feature
Structured, searchable meeting notes with action items and decisions
AI summaries and action items
Team usage
On-demand AI assist via keyboard shortcut during calls
Sync notes to docs and task tools
Integrations
Bring-your-own-key support for Gemini, OpenAI, Claude, and Groq
Multi-language support
Languages & capture
Fully local/offline option through Ollama with local data storage by default
Shareable recaps
Best-fit workflow
Works alongside Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams without a visible bot
Automatic capture and transcription
Best for
Natively
Choose Natively if you need capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot — strengths include free and open source with active development.
timeOS
Choose timeOS if you need automated post-meeting workflows — strengths include automates post-meeting follow-up across tools.
Pros & cons
Natively
+ Free and open source with active development
+ Can run entirely offline and store data locally for privacy
- Cloud models require user-supplied API keys and incur external usage costs
timeOS
+ Automates post-meeting follow-up across tools
+ Works across major platforms
- Joins meetings to capture them
FAQ
Is Natively or timeOS better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Natively is strong for capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot, while timeOS is strong for automated post-meeting workflows. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Natively and timeOS compare on price?
Natively is a free tier with paid upgrades and timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Natively and timeOS?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.