Natively and Proactor AI are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Natively: A free, open-source desktop AI meeting assistant offering real-time transcription, structured notes, and on-call answers with local processing and bring-your-own-key support. Proactor AI: AI note-taking app that records conversations, transcribes in real time, and turns meetings into structured notes and tasks. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Natively when capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot matters most, and Proactor AI when capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A free, open-source desktop AI meeting assistant offering real-time transcription, structured notes, and on-call answers with local processing and bring-your-own-key support.
Bring-your-own-key support for Gemini, OpenAI, Claude, and GroqFully local/offline option through Ollama with local data storage by defaultOn-demand AI assist via keyboard shortcut during calls
Natively is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Proactor AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Real-time transcription with a low-latency Rust-based audio pipeline
Real-time speech-to-text transcription
Standout feature
Structured, searchable meeting notes with action items and decisions
AI summaries, key insights, and in-conversation suggestions
Team usage
On-demand AI assist via keyboard shortcut during calls
Automatic action items with assigned owners and due dates
Integrations
Bring-your-own-key support for Gemini, OpenAI, Claude, and Groq
Notes organized by speaker and topic
Languages & capture
Fully local/offline option through Ollama with local data storage by default
Cross-session context retention
Best-fit workflow
Works alongside Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams without a visible bot
Export to PDF, Word, Markdown, and TXT
Best for
Natively
Choose Natively if you need capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot — strengths include free and open source with active development.
Proactor AI
Choose Proactor AI if you need capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks — strengths include converts conversations directly into trackable tasks with owners and due dates.
Pros & cons
Natively
+ Free and open source with active development
+ Can run entirely offline and store data locally for privacy
- Cloud models require user-supplied API keys and incur external usage costs
Proactor AI
+ Converts conversations directly into trackable tasks with owners and due dates
+ Real-time transcription and suggestions during the meeting
- Advanced capabilities are gated behind paid subscription tiers
FAQ
Is Natively or Proactor AI better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Natively is strong for capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot, while Proactor AI is strong for capturing meetings and immediately generating assignable follow-up tasks. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Natively and Proactor AI compare on price?
Natively is a free tier with paid upgrades and Proactor AI is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Natively and Proactor AI?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.