Natively and Notta are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Natively: A free, open-source desktop AI meeting assistant offering real-time transcription, structured notes, and on-call answers with local processing and bring-your-own-key support. Notta: AI transcription assistant that records and transcribes meetings in 58 languages across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Natively when capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot matters most, and Notta when multilingual meeting transcription matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A free, open-source desktop AI meeting assistant offering real-time transcription, structured notes, and on-call answers with local processing and bring-your-own-key support.
Bring-your-own-key support for Gemini, OpenAI, Claude, and GroqFully local/offline option through Ollama with local data storage by defaultOn-demand AI assist via keyboard shortcut during calls
Natively is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Notta is from $8.17/mo (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Real-time transcription with a low-latency Rust-based audio pipeline
58-language transcription
Standout feature
Structured, searchable meeting notes with action items and decisions
AI summaries
Team usage
On-demand AI assist via keyboard shortcut during calls
File upload transcription
Integrations
Bring-your-own-key support for Gemini, OpenAI, Claude, and Groq
CRM integrations
Languages & capture
Fully local/offline option through Ollama with local data storage by default
58-language transcription
Best-fit workflow
Works alongside Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams without a visible bot
AI summaries
Best for
Natively
Choose Natively if you need capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot — strengths include free and open source with active development.
Notta
Choose Notta if you need multilingual meeting transcription — strengths include transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage.
Pros & cons
Natively
+ Free and open source with active development
+ Can run entirely offline and store data locally for privacy
- Cloud models require user-supplied API keys and incur external usage costs
Notta
+ Transcription in 58 languages — among the widest coverage
+ Records across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex
- Free plan caps each recording at 3 minutes (120 min/month total) — not usable for full meetings
FAQ
Is Natively or Notta better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Natively is strong for capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot, while Notta is strong for multilingual meeting transcription. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Natively and Notta compare on price?
Natively is a free tier with paid upgrades and Notta is from $8.17/mo. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Natively and Notta?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.