Natively and Note67 are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Natively: A free, open-source desktop AI meeting assistant offering real-time transcription, structured notes, and on-call answers with local processing and bring-your-own-key support. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Natively when capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot matters most, and Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A free, open-source desktop AI meeting assistant offering real-time transcription, structured notes, and on-call answers with local processing and bring-your-own-key support.
A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models.
Natively is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Natively | Note67 |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Real-time transcription with a low-latency Rust-based audio pipeline | Local on-device transcription using Whisper |
| Standout feature | Structured, searchable meeting notes with action items and decisions | AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama |
| Team usage | On-demand AI assist via keyboard shortcut during calls | Captures both microphone and system audio |
| Integrations | Bring-your-own-key support for Gemini, OpenAI, Claude, and Groq | Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants |
| Languages & capture | Fully local/offline option through Ollama with local data storage by default | Native desktop app for macOS and Windows |
| Best-fit workflow | Works alongside Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams without a visible bot | Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device |
Natively
Choose Natively if you need capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot — strengths include free and open source with active development.
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
Natively
Note67
It depends on your workflow. Natively is strong for capturing real-time transcripts and structured notes from calls without a visible bot, while Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Natively is a free tier with paid upgrades and Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.