Mr. Transcription and Zell are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mr. Transcription: Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes. Zell: Berlin-based sales performance intelligence platform that analyzes real sales calls, surfaces skill gaps, and delivers AI coaching and roleplays, using GDPR-compliant on-device transcription. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mr. Transcription when creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings matters most, and Zell when analyzing real sales calls to score rep behaviors and identify skill gaps matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes.
Berlin-based sales performance intelligence platform that analyzes real sales calls, surfaces skill gaps, and delivers AI coaching and roleplays, using GDPR-compliant on-device transcription.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Zell is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mr. Transcription | Zell |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Transcription of audio, video, image, and PDF files in the browser | Captures and analyzes video, phone, and in-person sales calls |
| Standout feature | AI summarization that turns recordings into meeting minutes with key points | GDPR-compliant on-device transcription without a meeting bot or stored customer data |
| Team usage | Subtitle generation in SRT and VTT formats | Automated scorecards on talk patterns, objection handling, and discovery depth |
| Integrations | Translation across 100+ languages with automatic language detection | Instant AI call summaries after each conversation |
| Languages & capture | Speaker recognition and a customizable terminology dictionary | Skill-gap dashboard for managers across reps |
| Best-fit workflow | Privacy-focused paid plans described as keeping no logs | AI coaching, personalized coaching plans, and roleplay simulations |
Mr. Transcription
Choose Mr. Transcription if you need creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings — strengths include handles large files and a wide range of input formats including pdfs and images.
Zell
Choose Zell if you need analyzing real sales calls to score rep behaviors and identify skill gaps — strengths include privacy-first design with on-device transcription suited to gdpr-conscious eu teams.
Mr. Transcription
Zell
It depends on your workflow. Mr. Transcription is strong for creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings, while Zell is strong for analyzing real sales calls to score rep behaviors and identify skill gaps. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades and Zell is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.