Mr. Transcription and Wave are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mr. Transcription: Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes. Wave: Cross-platform AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings, calls, and voice memos into summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mr. Transcription when creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings matters most, and Wave when recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes.
Cross-platform AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings, calls, and voice memos into summaries.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Wave is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mr. Transcription | Wave |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Transcription of audio, video, image, and PDF files in the browser | Records meetings, calls, lectures, and voice memos |
| Standout feature | AI summarization that turns recordings into meeting minutes with key points | Bot-free tab audio capture plus combined tab and mic mode |
| Team usage | Subtitle generation in SRT and VTT formats | Speaker-labeled transcripts with summaries and action items |
| Integrations | Translation across 100+ languages with automatic language detection | Apps for iOS, Android, web, Mac, Windows, and Chrome |
| Languages & capture | Speaker recognition and a customizable terminology dictionary | Support for dozens of languages |
| Best-fit workflow | Privacy-focused paid plans described as keeping no logs | Encrypted cloud storage with no model training on user data |
Mr. Transcription
Choose Mr. Transcription if you need creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings — strengths include handles large files and a wide range of input formats including pdfs and images.
Wave
Choose Wave if you need recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining — strengths include bot-free capture across many platforms and devices.
Mr. Transcription
Wave
It depends on your workflow. Mr. Transcription is strong for creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings, while Wave is strong for recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades and Wave is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.