Mr. Transcription and UserCall are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mr. Transcription: Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes. UserCall: AI-moderated voice user interview tool that runs qualitative discovery calls and turns transcripts into evidence-linked themes. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mr. Transcription when creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings matters most, and UserCall when continuous product discovery and voice-of-customer programs matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes.
AI-moderated voice user interview tool that runs qualitative discovery calls and turns transcripts into evidence-linked themes.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); UserCall is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mr. Transcription | UserCall |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Transcription of audio, video, image, and PDF files in the browser | AI-moderated voice and text interviews via shareable interviewer links |
| Standout feature | AI summarization that turns recordings into meeting minutes with key points | Adaptive follow-up questioning trained on qualitative research practices |
| Team usage | Subtitle generation in SRT and VTT formats | Event-triggered interviews tied to product moments (signup, cancellation, etc.) |
| Integrations | Translation across 100+ languages with automatic language detection | Theme hierarchies with tagged, quote-linked excerpts from transcripts |
| Languages & capture | Speaker recognition and a customizable terminology dictionary | AI chat for custom exploration and pattern detection across data |
| Best-fit workflow | Privacy-focused paid plans described as keeping no logs | Support for 30+ languages with AI translation and moderation |
Mr. Transcription
Choose Mr. Transcription if you need creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings — strengths include handles large files and a wide range of input formats including pdfs and images.
UserCall
Choose UserCall if you need continuous product discovery and voice-of-customer programs — strengths include captures deeper qualitative context than static surveys without live scheduling.
Mr. Transcription
UserCall
It depends on your workflow. Mr. Transcription is strong for creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings, while UserCall is strong for continuous product discovery and voice-of-customer programs. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades and UserCall is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.