Mr. Transcription and Transkriptor are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mr. Transcription: Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes. Transkriptor: AI speech-to-text platform that transcribes meetings, interviews, lectures and audio/video files into editable text in many languages. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist Mr. Transcription when creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings matters most, and Transkriptor when transcribing recorded interviews and research conversations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes.
AI speech-to-text platform that transcribes meetings, interviews, lectures and audio/video files into editable text in many languages.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Transkriptor is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mr. Transcription | Transkriptor |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Transcription of audio, video, image, and PDF files in the browser | Automatic transcription of uploaded audio/video files and links |
| Standout feature | AI summarization that turns recordings into meeting minutes with key points | Direct meeting capture and transcription for Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams |
| Team usage | Subtitle generation in SRT and VTT formats | Speaker diarization that labels individual speakers |
| Integrations | Translation across 100+ languages with automatic language detection | Support for transcription in 100+ languages plus translation |
| Languages & capture | Speaker recognition and a customizable terminology dictionary | AI assistant and AI chat to summarize transcripts and answer questions |
| Best-fit workflow | Privacy-focused paid plans described as keeping no logs | SRT subtitle export and in-browser transcript editing |
Mr. Transcription
Choose Mr. Transcription if you need creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings — strengths include handles large files and a wide range of input formats including pdfs and images.
Transkriptor
Choose Transkriptor if you need transcribing recorded interviews and research conversations — strengths include handles many input methods (file upload, link, recording, and live meetings).
Mr. Transcription
Transkriptor
It depends on your workflow. Mr. Transcription is strong for creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings, while Transkriptor is strong for transcribing recorded interviews and research conversations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades and Transkriptor is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.