Mr. Transcription and timeOS are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mr. Transcription: Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes. timeOS: AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mr. Transcription when creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings matters most, and timeOS when automated post-meeting workflows matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes.
AI that auto-joins calls and delivers notes plus daily briefings
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mr. Transcription | timeOS |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Transcription of audio, video, image, and PDF files in the browser | Automatic capture and transcription |
| Standout feature | AI summarization that turns recordings into meeting minutes with key points | AI summaries and action items |
| Team usage | Subtitle generation in SRT and VTT formats | Sync notes to docs and task tools |
| Integrations | Translation across 100+ languages with automatic language detection | Multi-language support |
| Languages & capture | Speaker recognition and a customizable terminology dictionary | Shareable recaps |
| Best-fit workflow | Privacy-focused paid plans described as keeping no logs | Automatic capture and transcription |
Mr. Transcription
Choose Mr. Transcription if you need creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings — strengths include handles large files and a wide range of input formats including pdfs and images.
timeOS
Choose timeOS if you need automated post-meeting workflows — strengths include automates post-meeting follow-up across tools.
Mr. Transcription
timeOS
It depends on your workflow. Mr. Transcription is strong for creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings, while timeOS is strong for automated post-meeting workflows. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades and timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.