Mr. Transcription and StreamAlive are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Mr. Transcription: Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes. StreamAlive: Chat-powered live audience engagement tool for town halls and all-hands meetings, with AI question curation, polls, word clouds, and chat summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Mr. Transcription when creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings matters most, and StreamAlive when running interactive q&a during company all-hands and town hall meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes.
Chat-powered live audience engagement tool for town halls and all-hands meetings, with AI question curation, polls, word clouds, and chat summaries.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); StreamAlive is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Mr. Transcription | StreamAlive |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Transcription of audio, video, image, and PDF files in the browser | Chat-based audience participation across Zoom, Teams, Meet, and YouTube Live |
| Standout feature | AI summarization that turns recordings into meeting minutes with key points | AI-powered automatic detection and curation of audience questions |
| Team usage | Subtitle generation in SRT and VTT formats | AI generation of ready-to-use polls and interactions from a presentation or topic |
| Integrations | Translation across 100+ languages with automatic language detection | AI chat summaries with insights and notable quotes |
| Languages & capture | Speaker recognition and a customizable terminology dictionary | Live polls, word clouds, interactive maps, spinner wheels, and emoji reactions |
| Best-fit workflow | Privacy-focused paid plans described as keeping no logs | Post-session analytics and reports |
Mr. Transcription
Choose Mr. Transcription if you need creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings — strengths include handles large files and a wide range of input formats including pdfs and images.
StreamAlive
Choose StreamAlive if you need running interactive q&a during company all-hands and town hall meetings — strengths include designed specifically for engaging large town hall and all-hands audiences.
Mr. Transcription
StreamAlive
It depends on your workflow. Mr. Transcription is strong for creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings, while StreamAlive is strong for running interactive q&a during company all-hands and town hall meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades and StreamAlive is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.